No Free Lunch for Councillors

The following is Councillor Brad Clark’s motion to be debated February 13, 2026

CITY OF HAMILTON 

M O T I O N 

Budget General Issues Committee DATE:  February 6, 2026 

No more free lunches for the Council  

MOVED BY COUNCILLOR Brad Clark 

SECONDED BY COUNCILLOR Robert Cooper

WHEREAS the city funded lunch/meal program for elected members and the senior leadership team continues for the Planning Committee, General Issues Committee and Council; 

WHEREAS only four Councillors have voluntarily opted out; and 

WHEREAS the city of Hamilton employs over 9,000 staff who bring or buy their own meals. 

WHEREAS elected members and the senior leadership team are all on the sunshine list earning six figures. 

THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED:  

  • (a) That the Proposed 2026 Tax Budget BE AMENDED as follows: 
  • (i) ……. That the proposed Legislative budget BE REDUCED by $25,780, reflecting the cessation of funding of meals for elected members and the senior leadership team during Committee and Council meeting

The following is a news transcript covering this motion.

Motion calls for end to free lunches for Hamilton councillors

You may be surprised to learn that Hamilton city councillors and some senior staff get free lunches while attending certain meetings at City Hall. But at least one city councillor is saying that needs to end.

Ward 9 Councillor Brad Clark put forward a motion yesterday to end the program that gives them free meals during meetings.

Coun. Clark says city councillors in Hamilton make enough money — $108,000 a year. And he says they can bring their own lunches like many others do.

“Bottom line, councillors and senior leadership teams are making six figures, and they are getting a paid lunch or dinner,” said Coun. Clark.

Right now, Hamilton councillors and some senior staff, while attending committee and council meetings, get free food catered in, costing tax payers just under $26,000 a year. But Friday, Coun. Clark put forward a motion to end that funding.

“We have 9,000 employees at the City of Hamilton, they have all figured out how to bring their lunch or buy a lunch and get back in time to continue their job. Surely the councillors and senior leadership team can do the same thing,” said Coun. Clark.

“I make enough money to pay for my own lunch, which I think is the most important part. If councillors want to carry on doing this kind of thing, then go ahead and do it. Have it get taken out of your pay,” said Ward 2 Councillor Cameron Kroetsch.

Other municipalities in Ontario have already slashed free food for councillors, according to McMaster political science professor Peter Graefe.

“A number of cities used to do this. But we saw maybe 10-15 years ago, places like Ottawa, Toronto and Guelph backed away from it. The argument that ultimately these elected representatives could bring their own lunches and that it was an unnecessary expense. So I think Hamilton ends up as being a bit of an outlier because it hasn’t moved where other places have,” said Graefe.

So what do tax payers in Hamilton think?

“I think they should pay for their own. I bring a lunch every day,” said one man.

“I don’t get free meals at work. I think you got to pack a lunch,” said one woman.

“I think it makes sense, to a degree, as long as it’s controlled. I work in the public sector myself so I understand, we are working on the tax payer’s dollars. But I think anytime you bring people together during what would normally be their lunch period and they’re there together, I think it should be provided by the business, which in this case would be Hamilton,” said another man.

Coun. Clark’s motion was deferred by the mayor for a later date so staff can report back to council with more information and potential impacts.

“So let’s just make this decision with all of the information because if we do go to a different regime, I think we do need to think about the cost of the impacts of having longer breaks or more regimented breaks. I think we just need to have that information,” said Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath.

Council will vote on this next Friday after hearing from staff.

Web Page Editor Note: public may share their thoughts by writing to Mayor and Council and submitting their letter by email to clerk@hamilton.ca

Temporary Escarpment Lane Closure – Mud Street On-ramp to LINC

As per the Escarpment Closure procedure, please be advised of a planned closure on the Mud Street on-ramp to the Lincoln M. Alexander Parkway.

Mud Street on-ramp to Lincoln M. Alexander Parkway between the on ramp from the Upper Red Hill Valley Parkway and the Red Hill Valley Parkway. Below is an aerial map that better illustrates the area of the closure. 

Friday, February 6th from 9am to 3pm for guide rail repairs. The right shoulder will be temporarily closed and the merge lane of the Upper Red Hill Valley Parkway will need to be shortened and encroached upon to complete the repair. Delays are expected.

Mayor’s Budget Direction Leads to Staff Proposed Reduction in Grass Cutting in Three Ward 9 Parks and Parkettes

City staff have recommended the reduction of grass cutting in these parks/parkettes in Ward 9 (see graphics below). I have opposed this plan to reduce grass cutting on these properties without any public consultation. Staff are proposing a reduction in grass cutting in urban right of ways from 12 cycles to 9 cycles.

If you oppose this reduction in services, please write to the Mayor and Councillors to clerk@hamilton.ca

Please find below additional information regarding the proposed grass-cutting changes as provided by General Manager Jackie Kennedy.

Q1. What changes are being proposed for grass cutting in urban right-of-way areas?

A1: The City is adjusting its grass cutting schedule within municipal right-of-way areas, which are maintained by contracted services overseen by the Transportation Division of Public Works. The new approach keeps the current cutting cycle during the spring and early summer when grass grows most rapidly, but reduces the frequency later in the season when grass growth slows or becomes dormant. This means fewer cuts in late summer and fall, reflecting periods when mowing has limited visual or functional benefit. The annual cutting frequency will decrease from 12 to 9 cycles, resulting in a budget savings of $105,000. The City can add extra cuts if unusual weather leads to sustained grass growth. These changes are designed to maintain roadway safety, visibility, and urban appearance.

Q2. Will rural roadside mowing be affected by these changes?

A2: No, rural roadside mowing is not impacted by this proposal. It will continue as usual, following established service levels and practices from previous years. Although there were contractor delays in rural mowing in 2025, these issues have been resolved and are not expected to recur.

Q3: Will the changes affect sports fields?

A3: No, sports fields and key open grass areas in parks will continue to be mowed as usual.

Q4. What changes are proposed for grass cutting in City parks, open spaces, and private properties?

A4:  The City is proposing to reduce mowing in certain park areas and open spaces, resulting in a budget savings of $250,000. The reductions focus on non-City lands without service agreements and city properties with areas suitable for naturalization, such as spaces next to existing natural areas, woodlands, and unprogrammed spaces. Sports fields and key open grass areas in parks will continue to be mowed as usual. Areas not owned by the City and without agreements will receive notice that mowing will stop, but landowners can discuss establishing a paid service agreement if desired. Existing agreements, such as those with school boards adjacent to parkland, will continue.

Q5. Why are some areas being removed from the mowing program, and what happens next?

A5: To improve efficiency and focus staff on core services, the City reviewed mowing areas and identified some that could transition to naturalized landscapes. These areas, often adjacent to naturalized zones, will be promoted for biodiversity and healthy, native plant communities as part of the Biodiversity Action Plan. Residents will be informed about opportunities to participate in planting events as plans develop. Maps showing the spaces proposed for removal from the mowing program are available, with red dashed areas indicating where mowing will stop. Sports fields and key open spaces will remain part of the regular mowing program.

Q6. How will residents and landowners be notified about these changes?

A6: Landowners of non-City properties currently receiving mowing services without an agreement will be notified that the service will end. They may choose to discuss a formal agreement with the City if they wish to continue receiving mowing services, which would include compensation for the service.

Q7. Where can I find more information or see which areas will no longer be mowed?

A7: All spaces proposed for removal from the parks mowing program are shown in attached PDF map. The red dashed areas indicate spaces that will no longer be mowed. Key open spaces and sports fields will continue to be maintained by the parks team.